Histolircal exhibits play a vital role in transmitting historical knowledge to the public. They often appeal to a broad range of audiences, including families. They also often commemorate historical events and injustices. In every case, they contain an interpretive element. The process of selecting an exhibit, for example, implies interpretations of causes and effects. Despite the importance of museum exhibits, attempts to suppress them may stifle a healthy and open dialogue.
Exhibitions should strive to be more than simply historical objects nailed to the wall. They should strive to engage visitors and spark their curiosity. The careful juxtaposition of objects, graphics, and narratives can help viewers to understand historical concepts. For example, they can help them understand that people did not live in isolation in the past. Their actions affected those living nearby, as well as those far away.
Museums are expected to make their exhibits relevant to the community, state, or nation. They must also present a coherent idea and ensure that the exhibition environment is safe and appropriate for a variety of visitors. This is especially true for exhibits that are designed to appeal to a diverse audience.
The proliferation of historical exhibits in the United States has resulted from recent economic and social trends, such as the increasing marketability of local heritage, and the national dialogue about identity. However, scholarship about the history of historical exhibition has largely focused on large, professional museums. This article explores the various types of historical exhibits, including corporate exhibits and academic exhibits, and explains how each of these forms of exhibition emerges.