While it may seem that creating cultural heritage is a collective activity, individuals play an important role in the creation of such things. In a sense, the deprivation of normative agency is itself a form of genocide. It damages an individual’s wellbeing and erodes their sense of normative agency. In such a case, it makes sense to protect the cultural heritage of a group, including its cultural practices. If the purpose is purely material, the preservation of cultural heritage could also be done by removing the material relics from the site.
There are numerous reasons why cultural heritage is important to society. In the event of a conflict, preserving a culture and its artifacts can be therapeutic and aid the recovery process of war victims. General Douglas MacArthur supported the Japanese efforts to preserve their culture after WWII, while the Nazi concentration camps were turned into museums and memorials. Hence, cultural heritage is not about ignorance, but a critical aspect of our society. We must cherish it and protect it for future generations.
Moreover, art serves a communicative function, offering a unique perspective on the world. Cultural appropriation raises ethical issues concerning the representation of cultural heritage and its display. Further, it raises questions about the political goods of art, including the role of marginalized cultures. If cultural appropriation is a concern, preserving cultural heritage is a good first step. The next step is to implement the policy. There are many guidelines to follow in the development of this policy.
The management of cultural objects consists of reconciling competing interests and protecting them. The objects are categorized according to their heritage and social function. Highly symbolic objects, for example, have enormous value to the people involved. Artefacts produced for market will not pass the heritage title test; they must be tangible symbols of lost family life. This way, they can be preserved indefinitely. When it comes to ensuring that these objects remain as a lasting cultural legacy, it is imperative to protect them as much as possible.
In addition to protecting cultural heritage, there are also some specific guidelines to ensure that it remains in tact and continues to be a resource. Unlike the law of property, the law for cultural heritage protects individuals and their rights to maintain their cultural heritage. This is important because, without proper protection of the cultural heritage, the owner of the property cannot destroy or alienate it. Hence, there are a number of legal restrictions on the use of cultural property.
When it comes to protecting cultural heritage, preserving its value and aesthetic qualities is vital. As such, this paper aims to make sense of the ambiguity between the values of authenticity and the value of art and culture. This study also provides an excellent example for the ethical and aesthetic aspects of cultural heritage. There are a number of other considerations that need to be considered, but it is crucial to recognize the important role of cultural heritage in our lives.